By John Stuart Mill

ISBN-10: 0710075065

ISBN-13: 9780710075062

Show description

Read or Download A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, Part II (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill - Volume 08) PDF

Similar logic books

Read e-book online Philosophy of Language (Routledge Contemporary Introductions PDF

Philosophy of Language: a modern creation introduces the scholar to the most concerns and theories in twentieth-century philosophy of language, focusing in particular on linguistic phenomena. themes are established in 3 components within the e-book. half I, Reference and Referring Expressions, contains themes corresponding to Russell's thought of Desciptions, Donnellan's contrast, difficulties of anaphora, the outline concept of right names, Searle's cluster idea, and the causal-historical concept.

Julia Häuberer's Social Capital Theory: Towards a Methodological Foundation PDF

The sphere of social capital nonetheless lacks a famous basic thought. for that reason, numerous and infrequently irrelevant measurements are used for it. Julia H? ¤uberer contributes to filling during this hole and gives development in the direction of the construction of a formalized social capital conception in accordance with the founding ideas of social capital of Bourdieu (1983) and Coleman (1988), and present techniques of Putnam (2000), Burt (1992) and Lin (2001).

Extra info for A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, Part II (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill - Volume 08)

Sample text

In the next section, we identify useful, objective forms of knowledge that can be nicely encoded in ASP and we investigate how to represent them in FO(ID). 1 Representing Objective Knowledge in ASP and FO(ID) Representing UNA and DCA Implicitly, ASP maintains the Unique Names Assumption (UNA(Σ)) [27] that all ground terms of ΣF un represent different objects, and the Domain Closure Assumption (DCA(Σ)) [27] that each object in the universe is represented by at least one ground term of ΣF un . , databases), but neither UNA nor DCA are imposed in FO.

Theories. ), we are indebted to Michael Gelfond and Vladimir Lifschitz, whose work, as can be seen in this paper, has been a continous source of inspiration. References 1. : Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003) 2. : Approximating general logic programs. In: ILPS, pp. 181–198 (1993) 3. : Expanding queries to incomplete databases by interpolating general logic programs. J. Log. Program. 35(3), 195–230 (1998) 4. : Competence in knowledge representation.

Let S be a set of arguments such that Cnl(S) is inconsistent. Let Y = N B(S) Hence Y is inconsistent. From the assumption-discrimination of CN, it follows that there is Z ⊆ Y such that A = (Z, α) is an argument. As N B(S) is a base of S, A is generated by S. Since A attacks each argument having α as an assumption, A attacks S. Hence S implicitly attacks itself. It follows immediately from lemma 3 and theorem 1 Theorem 2. Suppose CN is assumption-discriminate. Then the abstract assumption-based argumentation framework satisfies both the logical closure- and consistency-properties.

Download PDF sample

A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, Part II (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill - Volume 08) by John Stuart Mill


by Paul
4.4

Rated 4.99 of 5 – based on 50 votes